Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:23 PM // 13:23   #1
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Prowlinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Guild: [HYE]
Profession: E/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Question Question for Gaile/ Andrew re: GWEN

Dear Gaile/ Andrew:

The community is in limbo about GWEN's HoM section. Many of us, including myself, are waiting to do anything with the HoM (besides just applying the tapestries) until Anet makes changes.

Why?

Nobody likes the HoM current design. We all want it to be account based and not character based. Only destroyer weapons are allowed/saved in the weapon section but greens are not (and the destroyer weapons are far from being liked). There are still numerous issues in placement of heroes and pets... they don't show up correctly. The design should allow any and all heroes to be shown but maybe only 5 on the pedestal at a time. Titles are only shown for the character that has grinded there and spent alot of time to do so.

Chances are that there are 20 other titles on the account but not on this one character. A smarter design would be to link all the titles to the HoM for the account; and when GW2 shows up, the whole account can unlock various items (maybe 1 at a time per character in GW2)... from your past GW1 rewards in HoM.

The community thought the HoM would be an account accumulation of titles, awards, and recognitions to show off to everyone. Alas, it is character based and severely crippled in its design. Nobody wants to tie their hard earned pets and customize them just for HoM.

Sure I have 8 characters... but bringing all 8 to the HoM, customizing pets for them.... each having different titles etc... we imagine the original design model was to encourage re-playability using all your characters but some of us think it has produced the opposite effect.

This question is mainly for the community to get some answers -

Will there be changes to the Hall of Monuments in the future that *may* encompass community requested alterations over the current design?


As always, thanks for listening and all the hard work.... the Mad King dost cometh soon!
Prowlinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:25 PM // 13:25   #2
Furnace Stoker
 
Lonesamurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cheltenham, Glos, UK
Guild: Wolf Pack Samurai [WPS]
Profession: R/A
Default

Well i think its more a case of lets let them know what we want and desire and hell, it might just come true
Lonesamurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:28 PM // 13:28   #3
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

While I understand and agree with most of the 'problems' you pointed out, except the the minis customization nothing you listed should prevent you from adding things to your hall now.

Any changes that are made (if they are made) would have to be made to all halls.

Enjoy it now as is and hope for changes later.
The Cold0   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:35 PM // 13:35   #4
Furnace Stoker
 
Crom The Pale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Ageis Ascending
Profession: W/
Default

Most of these questions have been asked and aswered. People just don't like the "wait and see" answer we were given.

It will remain character based, that will not change.

Customizing of mini-pets will remain.

Mixed armor is a maybe, Andrew stated this.

As for weapons they just do not have a good answer yet, its been sugested many times that a 2 lvl system be set up. One level for Destroyer weapons that unlock stuff for GW2 and a second level simply for display of any weapon we chose with 0 unlocks tied to it.
Crom The Pale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:43 PM // 13:43   #5
Furnace Stoker
 
EternalTempest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United States
Guild: Dark Side Ofthe Moon [DSM]
Profession: E/
Default

The effect HoM has had on me is I only play a single character now, all other's are "storage" characters. The amount of time I have to play pretty much will allow me my main chacter only.

To me this is ok, but I know other people who have put a lot of time and effort in multiple characters, this doesn't sit well.
EternalTempest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:45 PM // 13:45   #6
Hell's Protector
 
lyra_song's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
Default

PLEASE stop talking about your desires as everyone's desires.

PLEASE stop talking about your thoughts as everyone's thoughts.

i dont have a problem with you voicing a complaint, but generalizing for all of us is really really annoying.
lyra_song is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:46 PM // 13:46   #7
Desert Nomad
 
Bankai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Guild: Bubblegum Dragons
Profession: Mo/E
Default

I like the character-based HoM.

Now stfu.
Bankai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:49 PM // 13:49   #8
Banned
 
KANE OG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Guild: Ogmios Graybeards
Profession: W/
Default

Yay! It should make things simpler knowing one person is the entire community!

KANE
KANE OG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 01:54 PM // 13:54   #9
Furnace Stoker
 
Yichi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Guild Hall, Vent, Guesting, PvE, or the occasional HA match...
Guild: Dark Alley [dR]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KANE OG
Yay! It should make things simpler knowing one person is the entire community!

KANE
I am??? sweet. gib me your stuff
Yichi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:13 PM // 14:13   #10
Krytan Explorer
 
thezed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa, USA
Guild: HoTR
Default

Account based mini customization is needed, and more weapons in Valor would be nice.

But your assumption that "We all want it to be account based and not character based." is WAY off. The HoM should remain character based. My mesmer i have played for a total of 12 hours should not get credit for the 5000+ hours i have put into my warrior.
thezed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:13 PM // 14:13   #11
Grotto Attendant
 
Mordakai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kyhlo
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowlinger
We all want it to be account based and not character based.
I don't. How would this work anyway? I don't want my Warrior having my Mesmer's armor in her HoM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowlinger
Only destroyer weapons are allowed/saved in the weapon section but greens are not (and the destroyer weapons are far from being liked).
Agreed, weapons need to be expanded. Maybe not all Greens, but definately all end-game weapons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowlinger
There are still numerous issues in placement of heroes and pets... they don't show up correctly. The design should allow any and all heroes to be shown but maybe only 5 on the pedestal at a time.
I have no problem with requiring "elite" Hero Armor to be needed. After all, we have to have "eilte" character armor to be shown, correct? Is this a Hall of Monuments, or Hall of Everything?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowlinger
Titles are only shown for the character that has grinded there and spent alot of time to do so.
And so they should be given the reward. Why should a brand new Factions character that's been around for 10 hours get the same treatment as one that's been around for 2 years, and has many Titles maxed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowlinger

The community thought the HoM would be an account accumulation of titles, awards, and recognitions to show off to everyone. Alas, it is character based and severely crippled in its design. Nobody wants to tie their hard earned pets and customize them just for HoM.
Hard earned? You mean, being around for a year? Only a few mini-pets are "hard earned" and, again, they would be cheapened if available for all your Characters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowlinger
Sure I have 8 characters... but bringing all 8 to the HoM, customizing pets for them.... each having different titles etc... we imagine the original design model was to encourage re-playability using all your characters but some of us think it has produced the opposite effect.
Then don't bring all 8 characters over. Only focus all the names and characters you want to carry over to GW2.

If you want all 8 characters' names reseverved, it's really not that hard to get to the Eye of the North and at least have something (if not everything) for every character.
Mordakai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:24 PM // 14:24   #12
Wilds Pathfinder
 
lucifer_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nottingham, England
Guild: The Venerable Truth [TvT] The Venerable Alliance [TvH] [TvL]
Profession: R/
Default

It looks like to me that the ones that don't have time to grind multiple characters on multiple titles and multiple achievements want an account based HoM.

And the ones that do have time to grind multiple characters on multiple titles and multiple achievements want a character based HoM.

Is there anyway we can have a balance between the two? To please both parties and both sets of minds?

At the end of the day I'm happy with either. I do concentrate on my main more than others, but GW2 will be a new start and I'm not really that concerned with my past achievements now.
lucifer_uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:26 PM // 14:26   #13
Krytan Explorer
 
immortius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Black Cats
Profession: E/Mo
Default

There is no reason for people not to hold out until GW2 is released. In fact, I probably won't purchase any destroyer weapon and armour sets until after GW2 is released and the exact unlocks are known. Although I'll probably buy the materials in advanced to avoid any sort of last minute sellout.
immortius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:27 PM // 14:27   #14
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Meat Axe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Profession: R/
Default

I really don't see how you could have assumed that the HoM was going to be account based from the information they gave us about it. I, and I'm sure many others, simply assumed that it was going to be character based. Sure, it was a bit iffy from those videos they showed from that game expo (the ones that showed the armour monuments as a mix of various professions and genders, but turned out these were just generic statues).

I don't particularly care about the fact that it's character based. In fact, it's better in the fact that I now have something to do before GW2 (at the moment I am thinking I want enough Halls to make a character of each race. This may change, and probably will, if I start finding it too tedious).

Also, if you read the talk page about the minipet monument, Gaile has stated the team is working on a way for the minipets to be customised for the account, but only the character that initially stores them will be given benefits from them.
Meat Axe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:33 PM // 14:33   #15
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Prowlinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Guild: [HYE]
Profession: E/
Default

If my perspective isn't yours, then post about it... but no need to be rude about it ....

If there was a "wait and see" post from Anet... I obviously missed it...
Prowlinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:37 PM // 14:37   #16
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia, US
Guild: TFgt
Profession: W/Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_uk
It looks like to me that the ones that don't have time to grind multiple characters on multiple titles and multiple achievements want an account based HoM.

And the ones that do have time to grind multiple characters on multiple titles and multiple achievements want a character based HoM.
QFT. ANet seems to be on the side of those who prioritize GW high in their life, and therefore spend the time in-game instead of elsewhere.

Thanks!
TabascoSauce
TabascoSauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:38 PM // 14:38   #17
Pyromaniac
 
YunSooJin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Profession: Mo/W
Default

It's not just greens. Personal golds that we have obtained cannot be enshrined in HoM either.

I have 2 sets of req 8 weapons that I would like to put into HoM since they are the only weapons I have used since Factions (since I like the skins) and instead ANET has saved that area for some relatively cheap crappy looking skins.

Not to mention, onyx gemstone + diamonds = magma-type weapons? WTF were you smoking?
YunSooJin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 02:47 PM // 14:47   #18
Hell's Protector
 
lyra_song's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_uk
It looks like to me that the ones that don't have time to grind multiple characters on multiple titles and multiple achievements want an account based HoM.

And the ones that do have time to grind multiple characters on multiple titles and multiple achievements want a character based HoM.

Is there anyway we can have a balance between the two? To please both parties and both sets of minds?

At the end of the day I'm happy with either. I do concentrate on my main more than others, but GW2 will be a new start and I'm not really that concerned with my past achievements now.
The HoM titles should be all based on how the title works....

Cartography titles are char based, so it should be char based in HoM.
Hero titles are account based, so it should be account based in HoM.

Makes sense right?
lyra_song is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 04:41 PM // 16:41   #19
Forge Runner
 
Dougal Kronik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Guild: Glengarry Fencibles
Profession: R/
Default

I'm pretty satisfied with the HoM the way it is now.

I do think they should get rid of the mini pet section completely, so I just don't use it.
Dougal Kronik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2007, 05:01 PM // 17:01   #20
Desert Nomad
 
Vinraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TabascoSauce
QFT. ANet seems to be on the side of those who prioritize GW high in their life, and therefore spend the time in-game instead of elsewhere.

Thanks!
TabascoSauce
That's a strange way to put it. Isn't it really just a case of greater rewards for those who have put more time into the game? How is that a surprising thing?

I'm guessing I'll never get anything close to a maxed HoM on even one character, but the concept of the HoM makes more sense to me as a character based thing anyway. Ultimately, though, I'm just not that worried about it one way or the other.
Vinraith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mazey vorstagg The Riverside Inn 93 Sep 20, 2007 11:06 PM // 23:06


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 AM // 00:00.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("